Needed, but undertrained
60% of leaders call decision-making and prioritisation critical. Only 39% say they have received training.
Corporate L&D · decision practice at cohort scale
Decision practice for leaders. Cohort proof for L&D.
A ready-to-run programme that gives managers repeated practice in real business decisions—and gives L&D evidence of capability without exposing anyone's work.
10 chapters · 18 methods · 53 cases with outcomes withheld
The capability gap hiding behind completion
L&D is asked to build judgment with tools that mostly count attendance.
The business needs better calls under uncertainty. L&D can show who finished a course—but rarely how those people actually reasoned.
Expensive when it fails
61% of managers say at least half of decision time is ineffective—about $250M in annual wages at a typical Fortune 500 company.
Wanted, but unfunded
98% of L&D respondents want to quantify impact. Only 24% of organisations allocate a specific measurement budget.
Sources: DDI Global Leadership Forecast 2025 (10,796 leaders / 2,014 organisations); McKinsey 2019 (1,200+ managers); GP Strategies / Watershed 2025 (n=241).
The category's missing layer
Most stacks record content and confidence. Decidenda records a decision.
We do not pretend a three-week programme proves business ROI. We produce the missing leading evidence: people made a call, defended it and improved a shared reasoning pattern.
A real attempt
Every learner commits to a private written decision before seeing the outcome, feedback or anyone else’s view.
A transparent review
Feedback is organised around the same five FRAME moves, with the evidence behind it visible to the learner.
A shareable pattern
The owner sees baseline-to-final movement and the next cohort practice—not personal answers or a leaderboard.
Private decisionTransparent feedbackCohort evidence
Industry baseline: completion and attendance are used on most programmes in 83% of organisations; realistic decision assessment is routinely used by a minority. eLearning Guild / LTEM evaluation survey, 2019.
From brief to live cohort
Launch judgment practice without building a curriculum from scratch.
- 01
Choose a prepared 3-, 6- or 8-week sequence for the capability you need.
- 02
Add the cohort and set one start date—no case writing or weekly assembly.
- 03
Invitations, private practice, reminders and deadlines run in one flow.
- 04
Close with a privacy-safe baseline-to-final cohort review.
Not another content library and not an LMS migration. Decidenda composes the existing Business Judgement Course and case library into one runnable programme.
decidenda.com · Programmes · Judgment Sprint
3-week prepared programme
Judgment Sprint
Week 1Baseline · Rolls-RoycePrivate decision before teaching
Week 2Learn + practise · NikeFRAME chapter and a new context
Week 3Final · KlarnaPaired cohort evidence closes
Invitations and reminders scheduledPreview participant view
One shared language
FRAME turns “good judgment” into five observable moves.
The same rubric follows every case. Learners know exactly what to improve; facilitators can debrief the reasoning without forcing one “correct” answer.
Frame
Define the decision and its limits.
Relevant evidence
Use facts that could change the choice.
Alternatives
Compare at least two real options.
Manage uncertainty
Name the risk, trigger and fallback.
Execute and learn
Choose a path and say when to revisit it.
Supervisor 101Week 02
RRelevant evidence
Use facts that could change the choice—not facts that merely decorate it.
Real-company caseRolls-Royce
Keep the 2028 target—or reset expectations now?
- What evidence supports your call?
- What would change your mind?
Learn→Decide→Write→Reflect
Practice, not exposure
One compact weekly loop: learn, decide, write, reflect.
A chapter teaches one reasoning move. A different company decision changes the context, evidence and stakes—so remembering the lesson is not enough.
1method to learn
1decision to defend
1new context to transfer into
Rolls-RoyceMcDonald’sHiltonSingaporeGarminKlarna
Short enough to fit real work. Structured enough to create a comparable reasoning record each week.
Proof without surveillance
We solve the proof–privacy trade-off instead of choosing one.
Personal reasoning remains a safe place to practise. The organisation gets a useful cohort signal only when enough paired submissions protect identity.
- Individual memoranda stay with their authors
- Individual FRAME reviews stay private
- The owner sees participation states, not content
- Aggregates require five paired submissions
Learning signals are not employee assessments and must not be used for hiring, promotion, dismissal or compensation decisions.
Participant account
Your memo stays yours.
- Original written reasoning
- Individual FRAME review
- Evidence behind each score
- Recommended next practice
Private→No individual content crosses this line
Programme owner
Run the cohort without reading the work.
- Invited, joined and submitted
- Reminder controls
- Aggregate report at n ≥ 5
- No names, memos or rankings
The artifact L&D can carry upstairs
End with a business conversation—not a completion report.
The closing view shows where reasoning moved, where the cohort still struggles and what to practise next—without ranking a single employee.
- Paired baseline and final participation
- Movement and spread across all five FRAME dimensions
- The weakest shared reasoning move
- A ready prompt for the next team debrief
The example is illustrative. No cohort view is released below five completed baseline–final pairs.
Illustrative cohort report8 paired submissions
8baseline–final pairs
+3.5average FRAME movement
Aweakest final dimension
FRAME dimensionBaselineFinal
FFrame11.815.6
REvidence12.415.2
AAlternatives9.613.1
MUncertainty11.215.4
EExecute12.816.2
Next debrief · compare a serious second optionNo individual ranking
Judgment Sprint · founding pilot
Answer the only question that matters: is this worth repeating?
One cohort, three weeks and success criteria agreed before launch. Expand only if the team participates, the report is useful and the owner effort is sane.
- W0
Plan
Choose one cohort, the capability question and the evidence that would justify a repeat.
Success criteria - W1
Baseline
Everyone makes a private decision before the learning sequence begins.
Starting pattern - W2
Practise
Learn one FRAME move and apply it to a different company decision.
Repeatable rhythm - W3
Final and review
Complete the paired decision and inspect the privacy-safe cohort report together.
Expand / change / stop
A claim you can test
Let us prove the programme with one cohort—not with a sales promise.
Bring one team and one capability question. We configure the programme, run the invitations and close with evidence you can inspect together.
No fee · three weeks · no individual surveillance · publish only with written approval
Arrow keys · swipe · space